![]() Ford quickly found itself struggling to keep pace with Chevrolet’s latest LS-series offerings, and began searching for possible recourse.ĭuring these efforts, continued utilization of the prior modular platform would be deemed necessary, as this would prove the most feasible route moving forward. However, growing stakes within the performance market soon pushed the 4.6 modular engine from favor. The 4.6-liter V8 also saw duty beneath the Mustang Mach 1’s hood from 2003 to 2004. Furthermore, the 4.6-liter V8’s basic design could be easily replicated, to produce alternative engines of varying cylinder counts, without the need for expensive retooling within a given manufacturing facility.īy the late 1990s, the 4.6-liter V8 had found its way beneath the Mustang’s hood, serving as the motivating force behind the SVT Cobra. This engine featured a nearly 1:1 bore (3.552”) to stroke (3.543”) ratio, which proved optimal in the reduction of noise and vibration. What separated the 4.6-liter V8 from its earlier predecessors, was the manner in which it was constructed. ![]() Select variants of the 4.6-liter V8 also became a mainstay of F-Series pickup production, while carrying the “Triton” name. This engine served as the Genesis of Ford’s modular engine program and served as the powerplant of choice for many Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury sedans. The lineage of the 5.0-liter “Coyote” V8 can be traced back more than 30-years, to Ford’s initial release of the 4.6-liter small block in 1990. In this format, the Coyote dishes out more than 400-horsepower, without sacrificing anything in the way of reliability or efficiency. Today, the Coyote V8 has found its way beneath the hood of several Ford vehicles, including the Mustang GT. Initially debuting in 2010, the 5.0-liter Coyote V8 blurred the line between practicality and performance, proving just how potent a modular engine could be. However, the bulk of Ford’s earlier modular platforms pale in comparison to the company’s now-infamous “Coyote” V8. Along the way, Ford has produced a number of reliable engines, many of which have served as true workhorses. By all accounts, this is an approach that has paid dividends for the automaker, as the overall cost of engine production has been slashed, and the process of acquiring parts has been streamlined. ![]() Over the past several decades, Ford has relied heavily upon the use of various modular engines when equipping their latest production vehicles. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |